<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myofascial release: an evidence-based treatment approach?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/myofascial-release-an-evidence-based-treatment-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/myofascial-release-an-evidence-based-treatment-approach/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/myofascial-release-an-evidence-based-treatment-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/?p=464#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

I think this depends on the particular brand of MFR. If you are referring to claims regarding therapeutic mechanism, well, these may range from the the plausible to the utterly ridiculous. 

The most comprehensive (and often emotional) discussion of this subject  can be found here: http://www.somasimple.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1841</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>I think this depends on the particular brand of MFR. If you are referring to claims regarding therapeutic mechanism, well, these may range from the the plausible to the utterly ridiculous. </p>
<p>The most comprehensive (and often emotional) discussion of this subject  can be found here: <a href="http://www.somasimple.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1841" rel="nofollow">http://www.somasimple.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1841</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ingraham</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/myofascial-release-an-evidence-based-treatment-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ingraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/?p=464#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Luke, what’s your opinion on the plausibility of MFR’s central claims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke, what’s your opinion on the plausibility of MFR’s central claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/myofascial-release-an-evidence-based-treatment-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerickardsosteopath.net/?p=464#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Dear readers,

I have received an anonymous complaint regarding the format of the text initially posted above. By adding background and commentary to the content of the abstract being referred to, there is a potential for confusion regarding the origin of the text. 

I sincerely apologise for any such confusion and will ensure appropriate quotation to avoid this in the future.

Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear readers,</p>
<p>I have received an anonymous complaint regarding the format of the text initially posted above. By adding background and commentary to the content of the abstract being referred to, there is a potential for confusion regarding the origin of the text. </p>
<p>I sincerely apologise for any such confusion and will ensure appropriate quotation to avoid this in the future.</p>
<p>Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

